Research & field notes
This library grows as concept notes, method notes, apparatus lessons, and study records. Unfinished work is labelled unfinished. Synthetic examples live under Examples, not as client outcomes.
Field notes
Signature distinctions and operational maps. Working definitions are labelled as such. Each note includes a checklist, matrix, or decision rule.
The gap between claims an organization currently relies on and the evidence it can currently produce under the scope that now applies. Inventory fields, interest, and a decision rule before repeating a claim.
Read the concept noteStep, authoritative record, failure signal, owner, evidence required. Why each column exists, how missing one creates evidence debt, and when to reopen the map after a published amendment.
Read the method noteSeparate citation presence, retrieval relevance, entailment, and decision usefulness so relevant passages stop laundering unsupported claims.
Read the concept noteA deterministic claim auditor cleared engineering gates and failed blind human gold. Lexical match is not support. Independent first-pass audit still requires human disposition.
Read the apparatus lessonStudy records and technical notes
Active empirical work and architecture notes. Status language stays honest.
A controlled study testing whether provenance, uncertainty, disconfirmation, and final claim-audit controls reduce unsupported claims in AI-assisted research without winning by saying less.
Open the study recordIntent graphs across semantic routing, task-dependency planning, skill composition, and commercial search journeys, with a MainFrame implementation lens.
Read the technical noteMapping work on false-completion detection, appropriate abstention when evidence is absent, and evaluator self-calibration against blind human gold.
Examples live elsewhere
Synthetic OOS reconstruction, regulatory-change maps, and the buyer-readiness claims package show deliverable shape without borrowing client credibility. Permissioned peer collaboration notes appear there when approved.
The Evidence Intelligence Research Sprint converts a consequential question into a controlled source register, analysis, decision memo, appendix, and briefing.